Comments on: Vancouver Riot was not Brock Anton’s first run-in with the law http://www.doublehearsay.com/2011/vancouver-riot-was-not-brock-antons-first-run-in-with-the-law-87 Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:01:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.3 By: black tea http://www.doublehearsay.com/2011/vancouver-riot-was-not-brock-antons-first-run-in-with-the-law-87/comment-page-1#comment-160 Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:00:18 +0000 http://www.doublehearsay.com/?p=87#comment-160 Excellent post however I was wondering if you could write a litte
more on this subject? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Kudos!

]]>
By: DH http://www.doublehearsay.com/2011/vancouver-riot-was-not-brock-antons-first-run-in-with-the-law-87/comment-page-1#comment-16 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:43:39 +0000 http://www.doublehearsay.com/?p=87#comment-16 Thanks for the tip, Kayla. I see that other web sources have alluded to the possibility that “the” Brock Anton was from Duncan (go figure that so few of these thugs seem to actually live in Vancouver!) but appreciate your confirmation. Do you know if he still lives in Duncan and was just on the mainland to be part of “history”?

]]>
By: Kayla http://www.doublehearsay.com/2011/vancouver-riot-was-not-brock-antons-first-run-in-with-the-law-87/comment-page-1#comment-15 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:36:17 +0000 http://www.doublehearsay.com/?p=87#comment-15 Yep, this is the same Brock Anton! I’m from Duncan as well

]]>